<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Out of the Box Grails + JEE Integration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonrudolph.com/blog/2006/12/18/out-of-the-box-grails-jee-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonrudolph.com/blog/2006/12/18/out-of-the-box-grails-jee-integration/</link>
	<description>puts Blog.new("nonsense")</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Rudolph</title>
		<link>http://jasonrudolph.com/blog/2006/12/18/out-of-the-box-grails-jee-integration/#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rudolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonrudolph.com/blog/2006/12/18/out-of-the-box-grails-jee-integration/#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Achim,
Yes indeed.  That's a legitimate gripe.  Luckily Grails should support environment-specific resources.xml files likely before the 1.0 release.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It looks like &lt;a href="http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Deployment-to-different-environments-and-JNDI-data-sources-p9099960.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Graeme clarified this on the mailing list&lt;/a&gt; as well. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Jason&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Achim,
Yes indeed.  That&#8217;s a legitimate gripe.  Luckily Grails should support environment-specific resources.xml files likely before the 1.0 release.  </p>

<p>It looks like <a href="http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Deployment-to-different-environments-and-JNDI-data-sources-p9099960.html" rel="nofollow">Graeme clarified this on the mailing list</a> as well. </p>

<p>Cheers,
Jason</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achim</title>
		<link>http://jasonrudolph.com/blog/2006/12/18/out-of-the-box-grails-jee-integration/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>Achim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonrudolph.com/blog/2006/12/18/out-of-the-box-grails-jee-integration/#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, that is certainly a nice feature. However once you put a dataSource bean in your resources.xml, the Grails data sources in grails-app/conf will no longer be used even if you do not deploy to a J2EE server. This means you can no longer use the jetty container that ships with Grails and all developers will have to have a J2EE container installed for deploying the application.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Or alternatively, you have to replace the resources.xml file manually when you create a production deployment. It would have been nice to be able to, e.g., say "for environment dev, use DevelopmentDataSource, for test, use the datasource jdbc/GrailsTest from your app server, and for prod, use jdbc/GrailsProd" - or other constellations depending on your environment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Achim&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that is certainly a nice feature. However once you put a dataSource bean in your resources.xml, the Grails data sources in grails-app/conf will no longer be used even if you do not deploy to a J2EE server. This means you can no longer use the jetty container that ships with Grails and all developers will have to have a J2EE container installed for deploying the application.</p>

<p>Or alternatively, you have to replace the resources.xml file manually when you create a production deployment. It would have been nice to be able to, e.g., say &#8220;for environment dev, use DevelopmentDataSource, for test, use the datasource jdbc/GrailsTest from your app server, and for prod, use jdbc/GrailsProd&#8221; - or other constellations depending on your environment.</p>

<p>Achim</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
